Top 10 'urban myths' of EHRs

For the most part, electronic health records are terrific. But they're far from perfect. And providers implementing EHRs shouldn't expect them to be problem-vanquishing panaceas, said Ann Meehan and Julia Kendrick of Nashville's Ardent Health Services.

Speaking at the  82nd  annual AHIMA conference and exhibition in Orlando on Monday, the two registered health information administrators (RHIAs), spotlighted what they considered the 10 most glaring myths about EHRs.

  1. Broken HIM processes are resolved in an EHR automatically. The goal, obviously, is to gain improved processes and functionality, said Kendrick. But implementing an EHR will often shine a surprising spotlight on operational areas that need work. The key is to flow chart all your current processes beforehand and plan ahead as much as you can.
  2. Chart reconciliation is a thing of the past. "Some paper has to be scanned," said Kendrick. "We still have to do chart reconciliations."
  3. "Missing charts… what are those?" Kendrick said that missing charts are a fact of life, "whether it's a piece of paper, or an HL7 interface." Mistakes are made. Monitoring and correcting errors must be a priority, and coding and operations teams should work closely together to identify missing charts.
  4. "Loose reports? Never again!" Loose reports "do not go away," upon implementation, said Kendrick. "We still get them, we just process them differently." Now they're in a pile waiting to be scanned. She said timely processing and scanning is imperative, and suggests "batch-process loose reports in order to decrease the processing time."
  5. "High DNFB? Solved!" It's important to monitor uncoded reports on a daily basis for DNFB ("discharged, not final billed"), and staffers should be prepared to record uncoded accounts, or accounts waiting for a response to a query or additional documentation, said Kendrick, adding that "coding and operations must work together, not be us versus them. Coders can't code if operations can't find the charts. Ands sometimes operations needs coders to ID things that might be missing."
  6. EHRs only gain you efficiency. Untrue. You get some inefficiencies too. "Electronic is only as smart as the build," said Kendrick. And manual workarounds will always be necessary. Moreover, headaches will be plentiful as different departments push back to varying degrees. For some, paper records will always be the preferred choice.
  7. EHRs will immediately help provider delinquency rate go down. "Yes… eventually," said Kendrick. "Just not right away." And in the mean time, "your providers are probably going to be one of your bigger obstacles. They want to sign paper, not a screen. They'll say, 'it doesn't work, I can't log in, it's too slow.' They're going to drive your staff crazy and complain to everyone who will listen." It's important to begin provider education very early in the process, and work really hard to eliminate as many paper deficiencies and lower delinquency rate as much as possible before you go live.

  8. Record storage is now a thing of the past. "People tend to forget the years and years worth of paper records in off-site storage," said Meehan, who stressed the added importance of keeping six months of charts to pull back out and correct records post-implementation.
  9. EHRs will translate into immediate staff reductions. Said Meehan: "Your CFO will say, 'How many FTEs can be reduced? And when? Yesterday, perhaps?'" That's not considering the "temporary staffing adjustments" that may be in order "to keep processes moving until more efficient and effective" and be redeployed to other HIM needs such as helping address regulatory and oversight issues. She suggests working with your vendor to help define staffing recommendations.
  10. "And they all lived happily every after…." AHIMA may be just a couple miles from the Magic Kingdom this year, but EHR adoption is not a fairy tale. "It's not without trials and tribulations," said Meehan. "But at the end of the day, the good overtakes the not so good. Change is not always easy. But be patient. Listen to what people are saying. Be upbeat and positive. There will be days when things don't go well. It's a transition. Educate, educate, educate – and in the case of some physicians, educate again."

 

Showing 23 Comments

Christy Wilson say: EHR not magic

EHR is not going to magically make a clinic run like clockwork. There are many factors that play into a successful implementation that many physicians are not aware of.

jasbmoore say: Fix the process!

#1 is the lynchpin. If you have a broken or inefficient process, how does throwing technology at it help? It doesn't. Invest time in process management up front. Have a clear understanding of the workflow before investing in any type of software package. That's true for any industry, not just healthcare.

jpm1 say: #11

"No need to worry. We have an implementation team. All requirements are understood."

jabickford say: EMR adoption

Cultural change that involves stake holders to be fully invested with the education and communication materials along with convincing those who particpate in the assembly of the EMR the age old question "what's in it for me?"

AMacke say: Parallels to ERP experience

I came to Health IT from years in general enterprise IT. The parallels with the various waves of business software (first generation MRP/ERP, client/server ERP, CRM, then performance management) are stunning. The article's point that software cannot fix broken processes and workflow is so obvious that it's almost trite - and yet that mistake is being made over and over.

Similarly, the point on integration deserves a bit more emphasis. Part of the problem here is lack of standardization in transactions used to exchange data - which stems from the lack of some sort of basic data dictionary. That train went off the rails years ago, when HIPAA transactions specs turned into loose suggestions requiring customization of EDI for each payor and/or large provider group.

There's a bit of a gold-rush mentality right now; lots of vendors and service providers selling lots of solutions. The hype certainly seems to sweep away reason at times. Articles like this one are helpful. Here's to hoping that something this important won't turn into a case study of how not to affect large-scale systemic change...

Tom Sowa say: EHR and the inertia that delays implementation

My main takeaway:
"Moreover, headaches will be plentiful as different departments push back to varying degrees. For some, paper records will always be the preferred choice."

This has been widely true just about anywhere where you have mid-level managers who don't have full confidence in the digital system they're asked to embrace. The solution has to involve some form of incentive and active coaching to make sure the process becomes something people can try and even adjust if need be.

LKMike say: Anyone going EMR needs to read this & absorb it.

I've been deeply involved in the EMR world for about 10 years now & can safely say that I've certainly seen #1 over & over again.

Physicians need to remember my golden rule:

"You need to be ready for an EMR, not the other way around." All these talks of EMRs saving time (=$$) are very true, at least for most systems out there. The fundamental key though is you need the time to invest upfront into the EMR in order to get it into the time saving swing of things.

If you're going with an EMR, GREAT! You're doing the absolute right thing, for both you & your patients.
Just make sure that you've read this top 10 list & be sure you're ready for the commitment. It will pay off in the end, if you treat it right (and if you're getting most major EMRs out there).

MBNMHIC say: Another myth

Another myth: EHRs automatically enable coordination of care.
An EHR within a silo is still an isolated medical record. Make sure your EHR system has the ability to exchange a patient’s record beyond the walls of the healthcare system. Fortunately there are Meaningful Use incentives coming for exchanging health information outside of the silo, so EHR vendors will have to step up to the plate a deliver.

$onnyJim say: Oops!

I did not mean to merge the records.....I was just trying to do a good job. Can't we just click a button and un-merge the data?

CThomas say: Wow, we're missing the entire point!

In the entire article, there is not one mention of the key in all of this, THE PATIENT!!! Therein lies the biggest flaw in the article and the concept.