Healthcare IT NewsHealthcare IT News
  • Home
  • Sections
    • Industry News
    • Hospitals & IDNs
    • Physician Practices & Ambulatory Care
    • Payers
    • Vendors
    • International
  • Issues
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
  • Resource Central
    • Research
    • White Papers
    • Web Seminars
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Newsletters
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Solutions Series
Select Your Homepage
Search eConnect
Login | Register
Home » News » Editorial & Commentary

E-mail to a FriendPrint
Social Bookmarking
  • Delicious Delicious
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Reddit Reddit
  • Newsvine Newsvine
  • Furl Furl
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Google Google
  • Yahoo Yahoo
Readers have a thing or two to say about CCHIT

Readers have a thing or two to say about CCHIT

April 27, 2009 | Healthcare IT News Staff

CCHIT May be HITECH’s Biggest Challenge
On April 17, drjj says:

While the widespread implementation of EHR’s is a laudable goal, it doesn’t appear that the practical realities of what this means for practicing physicians has received adequate attention.

For them, this is an expensive and disruptive proposition. When businesses make this commitment, they know that any resultant financial benefit will accrue to their bottom line. When private practicing physicians make these investments in time and money, they do stand to improve their quality (which most believe is high anyway), but the financial benefits accrue mainly to the insurance companies.

I wonder how many large corporations, several of whose leadership I heard clamoring for more widespread acceptance of EHR’s by physicians @recent World Health Care Conference in Washington, would spend for IT in this model.

And all this at a time when CMS seems to think it’s a good idea to continue either freezing or reducing physician Medicare payments every year!

I commend the current administration for making some funds available for this purpose; but if the barriers are too high and the requirements too stringent along with inadequate reimbursement, it’s unlikely we’ll get to the five-year time frame goal that has been set to accomplish widespread EHR adoption.

On April 20, reefdiver responds:

Drjj speaks for many busy, practicing physicians and practices out there.

Most surveys for the past five years, which have attempted to get at the root of why EMR adoption has been so low and de-install rate so high, show that the two top reasons have been cost and difficulty to use. Will the funding now being provided by the Stimulus Bill – up to $44,000 per physicians under Medicare or even $63,000 under Medicaid – change that and quickly enable ALL practices to adopt and use EMR? How can it? It only addresses HALF the problem?

My guess...and much of the conventional wisdom in the industry...is that Stimulus Bill funding will not be successful under the current circumstances. It may increase the adoption rate initially, as the enthusiasm and momentum for “change” drive things, and under the premise of EVENTUAL reimbursement (over five years). But it absolutely WILL NOT change the success rate of implementations. And likely, billions of Stimulus money will be wasted. WHY? One simple reason. CCHIT-driven certification.

CCHIT-certified systems are basically “Government EMR”. The continually expanding 480+ criteria to be “certified” continue to ignore “usability” as a criteria for earning the credential. Despite that government-funded groups’ good intentions and hard work, results are still disappointing and adoption rate is low. With a 50+% failure rate on installations even with CCHIT credentialling up to now, why should that improve by government dollars partially reimbursing practices for the same systems? In fact, if you accept the notion that the most tech-savvy physicians are those most likely to have already implemented--- or attempted to – then the “other 80+ percent” of physicians will be even less-likely to succeed. EMR systems have no “usablility” measures for physicians to compare. Stimulus funding is betting the farm – over $36 billion (less PROJECTED savings of $17 billion – where does that come from? What if it doesn’t?) – that this will work. Can we afford to squander billions of dollars on this “bet”?

While there are several landmark studies from highly reputable institutions and firms that conclude that CCHIT-based EMR implementation has produced NO broad-market results such as documented cost savings, reduction in medical errors or improved care results, there is not ONE landmark study that concludes to the contrary. Can anyone produce such a study? Can we continue on a path of providing billions for these systems where the benefits are still anecdotal? And where the physicians and practices have to pay the cost and the insurance companies receive the benefit?

Why not take a million or two million dollars and have a truly independent, reputable institution find out some answers in this area before we spend $36 billion like it is the answer to the problem?

Lets hope Ms. Sebelius, upon her deserved approval as White House Health Reform Czar, and Mr. Blumenthal upon his ascension to ONC look a lot harder at this. Committees for CCHIT and even the nascent group being put forward for HITSP seem to ignore the inclusion of high-performance, busy, practicing physicians in deciding for that group what it needs.”

 

Related Topics:
  • May 2009
  • Associate
  • CCHIT
  • David Blumenthal
  • information technology
  • Medicare
  • New England Journal
  • stimulus
  • Washington

Reader Comments (1)Login to Post a Comment

smunie says:

May 15, 2009 | 7:28PM GMT

Why "certified"

Reefdiver makes a great arguement. I would ask, is it necessary for an EMR to be "certified" in order to provide "meaningful use"? Wouldn't it be better if a standardized set of sample messages were produced and to "qualify" (or you pick another word) for the financial incentives, the system would have to manage those standard messages. Over time, the set of messages could be expanded.

For example, if a Lab were to qualify for funds it would have to accept orders and provide results electronically. If an Imaging Center were to qualify they would recieve orders and provide reports electronically.

Requiring certification will most likely drive costs up and create delays while vendors get in line to have their systems "certified" by a single body. Furthermore, the smaller companies will not have the resources to go through the process of certification and will most likely be pushed out of the market (not due to the performance of the product but by the cost of certification).

I understand the need for quality control. I'm just concerned that this will head the direction that we've gone with FDA regulation of modalities and Imaging Systems. It can easily take two years to have a product approved by the FDA before it can go to market. What does that do to cost and innovation?

Login to Post a Comment

Most Popular

Latest Headlines
Most Popular
  • Survey shows nurses spend most of their time on paperwork
  • Five features missing from most EHRs
  • WebMD launches social media
  • ONC issues rough draft of 2010 HIT strategic framework
  • Healthcare industry one of the most mobile
  • HHS announces $162 million in 16 state HIE grants
  • Denmark docs fully wired
  • GE Healthcare unveils new Virtual Sleep Lab
  • HIMSS10 registration figures up on all counts
  • European Union outlines 10-year eHealth plan
receive news by email

Resource Central

  • White Papers
    Six Things Hospitals Need to Know About Replacing Pagers With Smartphones
  • Web Seminars
    On-Demand--Part II-The Crystal Clear Healthcare Provider: How Cleveland Clinic Delivers Transparency to Stakeholders with Business Intelligence
  • Videos
    Sam's Club EMR
  • Podcasts
    Sam's Club EMR - Full Interview
  • White Papers
    Bridging Departmental Gaps with Healthcare IT Education
More Resources
Syndicate content

HEALTHCARE IT JOB SPOT

  • Architect - Clevelan Clinic Abu Dhabi - Abu Dhabi, U.A.E.
  • Epic Business Systems Analyst Ambulatory Practice Management Revenue Cycle - Lee Memorial Health System - Fort Myers, FL
  • Family Medicine Opportunity with EMR - Marshfield Clinic - Rice Lake, Ladysmith & Hayward, WI
  • Meditech Applications Analyst - Saint Joseph Health System - Anaheim, CA
  • Epic Revenue Cycle Manager - Lee Memorial Health System - Fort Myers, FL
more jobs

  • Healthcare Finance News

    Healthcare Finance News is the leading news source for healthcare's financial managers.

  • EHRWatch.com

    EHRWatch.com offers news, commentary and community participation on the developments in electronic health records.

  • Priming the Pump

    Priming the Pump provides practical news on the stimulus package and the incentives that it offers to healthcare providers.

  • Facebook

    Join Healthcare IT News on Facebook to connect with other readers!

  • NHINWatch

    Visit NHINWatch.com for coverage of the Nationwide Health Information Network.

  • Mobile Health Watch

    Stay up to date on the latest mobility news at Mobile Health Watch.

  • MedTech Publishing

    Visit our company Web page to learn more about MedTech Publishing.

  • LinkedIn

    Join our LinkedIn group to connect with other readers. Click here to join the group.

     

  • Healthcare IT Job Spot

    Check out the latest open positions at Healthcare IT Job Spot.

Marketplace

  • Home
  • Issues
  • Resource Central
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About Us
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
Healthcare IT News is a publication of MedTech Publishing Company LLC.
For more information about MedTech Publishing Company and its publications, please visit medtechpublishing.com.
©2009 MedTech Publishing
Powered by Phase2 Technology.