More voices raised against EHR incentives

Twila Brase

The Citizens' Council for Health Freedom (CCHF) has added its voice to those of four Republican lawmakers who recently called for a temporary halt to meaningful use incentives until the program is revamped.

But, unlike the lawmakers, CCHF wants federal involvement in EHRs eliminated altogether, according to Twila Brase, president of the CCHF.

CCHF, a non-profit organization based in St. Paul, Minn., does not want electronic health records pushed forward by a federal program at all, but rather supports the market leading the way. “[The] HITECH [Act] could go away as far as we’re concerned,” Brase told Healthcare IT News.

[See also: HIMSS rebuffs effort to stop EMR incentives.]

CCHF’s comments follow last week’s letter from four Republican congressional committee chairs to Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, calling for suspension of EHR incentive payments until universal interoperability standards are federally established. The Congressmen also called for stricter standards for achieving meaningful use and the elimination of  “subsidies to business practices that block the exchange of information between providers.”

Big Data and Healthcare Analytics Forum June 4-5 Washington

Brase said CCHF applauds the lawmakers’ position, but urges them to reconsider their support for EHRs, enhanced interoperability and online access. Brase said private-market solutions, coupled with consent requirements and individual responsibility for private health records, would be the best approach. In addition, CCHF calls for states to implement “true patient privacy laws,” as allowed under the HIPAA privacy rule.

“Left to its own devices, the market would fix interoperability issues on its own, while creating better protections for sensitive health data, or else patients would solve the problem themselves by carrying their private data on portable media such as DVDs or thumb drives,” Brase said. “The problems that the government continues to ignore are privacy and patient consent; no EHR program should move forward until every American has a guaranteed right of consent over the use and sharing of their private medical records.”

Brase said the CCHF has been concerned for a long time with where the government is going with EHRs, at both the state and national level.

According to Brase, currently between HITECH and the HIPAA law, some 2.2 million entities have access to a patient’s health data, without the patient’s consent. “When the public finally understands this, it will change the whole doctor-patient relationship,” she said. “Patients will try and protect themselves.”

“Our health data is being used for massive research for things we might find very objectionable,” Brase said. Further, evidence-base medicine, supported by EHRs, does not always support the best outcome for all patients, and is leading the way to healthcare rationing, Brase contends.

Previous
1

Showing 1 Comments

MedQuack say: Tax the Data Sellers and Keep HiTech

This incentive is needed and hospitals and doctors are using it who otherwise could not afford to upgrade from paper to electronic records. I do agree though on the consumer not knowing what is sold and what companies make huge profits from selling data thus I have suggested licensing and taxing the data sellers who make billions in profits doing so, and having a federal page to where companies, banks, etc. list what kind of data they sell and to who. FDA and NIH need money and there are threats out there to cut their funds which is also a no win too as technology is pushing this and not their fault they need to keep up with their jobs as all complain. Get the FDA the engineers they need and fund it. Why do corporations get this wonderful opportunity to make tons of money when they get their data for nothing and profits for free and turn the middle class into data chasers when it is flawed..and that is on the rise today as well.

http://ducknetweb.blogspot.com/2012/09/one-more-good-reason-to-tax-data....

All have a big hard lesson to learn about how IT infrastructure rules the world today with those who have the code have the control. There's no incentive for companies to set up factories and create more jobs when they can hire a few geeks mine and scrape data without all the overhead and this needs to be balanced and an excise quarterly tax could help do that and create funds where they are needed. We need to make it less lucrative to sell data and have new technologies used and manufactured here in the US as it creates real jobs.