Healthcare IT NewsHealthcare IT News
TwitterFacebookLinkedInHealthcareITNews International
  • Home
  • Topics
    • ARRA/Stimulus
    • Business Intelligence
    • Claims Processing
    • Data Warehousing
    • EDIS
    • Election 2012
    • Electronic Health Records
    • Enterprise Content Management
    • Enterprise Resource Planning
    • ePrescribing
    • Financial/Revenue Cycle Management
    • Health Information Exchange (HIE)
    • ICD-10
    • Mobile/Wireless
    • Network Infrastructure
    • Policy and Legislation
    • Privacy and Security
    • Quality and Safety
    • RIS and PACS
    • RTLS
    • Telehealth
    • Workforce Management
  • Issues
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • On Demand Webinars
  • White Papers
  • Blog
  • Events
  • HIMSS JobMine
  • RSS
  • Press Releases
  • Slideshows
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Supplements
  • Survey Analyses
  • Newsletters
  • Advertise
  • Login
  • Register
  • SUBSCRIBE
    • Newspaper
    • Email Newsletter
Home » News
Receive News By Email

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • RSS Icon
  

Maryland law requires insurers to pay doctors for EHR adoption

May 27, 2009 | Diana Manos, Senior Editor

Suggested Content

  • Maryland has three-step plan for getting health IT goals on fast track
  • Maryland hospitals, Erickson Retirement Communities collaborate on HIE
  • AMA beefs up practice management website
  • Johns Hopkins to employ tech to help boost healthcare in Kuwait
  • As states build exchanges, questions linger about interoperability
  • EHR/HIE Interoperability Workgroup agrees on connectivity specs
  • Social media sites providing health info need greater transparency

ANNAPOLIS, MD – A new law signed by Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley will coax physicians into making the switch from paper to electronic medical records by requiring private insurance companies to provide financial incentives.

Maryland officials have said this is the first state law of its kind to advance EHR adoption in this way.

The law also requires Maryland to designate a health information exchange for the state on or before October 1.

 "This is where government and private health care providers can come together to really improve not only the quality of care but also, hopefully, create some costs savings as well," O'Malley said, according to the Baltimore Sun. "Health IT is the future of healthcare in our country, and we want Maryland to lead the way."

Health Secretary John Colmers said the bill allows insurers to choose among several forms of inducement – increased reimbursements, lump-sum payments or in-kind services – so long as it has a monetary value, the Sun reported.

"The goal here in Maryland was to assure that all of the payers pull their oars in the same direction," Colmers said. "There is a great promise in electronic health records, but the greatest promise comes when it's done in a coordinated fashion, across all of the payers."

CareFirst, a large insurer in the mid-Atlantic region, already offers increased reimbursements to doctors who use electronic medical records.

Last summer, Maryland began piloting two electronic health exchanges, the Chesapeake Regional Information System for our Patients and the Montgomery County Health Information Exchange Collaborative.

Related Topics:
  • Martin O'Malley
  • Maryland

Reader Comments (1)Login to Post a Comment

Gpark1018 says: At What Cost?
June 01, 2009 | 9:42AM GMT

I would like to see more information on this reform.

Will policy holders in Maryland have to pay an additional premium for these EHR's. The money has to come from somewhere, and payers are not real keen about falling bottom lines.

Maryland has also decided that information must be delivered UP to the state from each provider.

Have they figured out how they are going to provide access to each patient?

Have they decided which providers MUST report UP to the state? All, or just some specialties? Will this include podiatrists as well as plastic surgeons?

I am not critical of their decisions, but I would like more information on how this is being accomplished.

Most Popular

Latest Headlines
Most Popular
  • Analytics and the future of healthcare
  • CNIO position on the rise
  • Health data breaches up 97 percent in 2011
  • Docs use iPads, but don't see them as game-changers
  • Greenway set for IPO
  • HIT figures prominently in GOP primary battle for Nevada
  • Mostashari expects big year ahead for data exchange
  • AMA, AHIMA at odds on ICD-10
  • Minnesota: A healthy appreciation for HIT
  • 5 issues affecting cloud service quality and performance

WEBINARS AND WHITE PAPERS

  • ON DEMAND WEBINARS
    The Value of Document and Content Management in Healthcare Transformation
  • WHITE PAPERS
    Winning the EHR Battle with Enterprise Content Management
  • WHITE PAPERS
    Mobility Advantage: Health Care Made Easier
  • WHITE PAPERS
    Driving Meaningful Use of Enterprise Content Management
  • ON DEMAND WEBINARS
    Case Study: Sentara Healthcare Completes an Award-Winning EHR with Enterprise Content Management
More Resources
Syndicate content

HIMSS JOBMINE

  • Program Analyst - Mathematica Policy Research - Princeton, NJ
  • Oracle Implementation Analyst - Virginia Mason Medical Center - Seattle, WA
  • Web and Custom Development Manager - Virginia Mason Medical Center - Seattle, Washington
  • Epic Analyst/Builder - Vitalize Consulting Solutions - Nationwide
  • Vice President - Tower Strategies - Remote
more jobs

Marketplace

Follow Healthcare IT News on TwitterFan Healthcare IT News on FacebookJoin Healthcare IT News on LinkedInRSS Subscriptions
Digital EditionBlogEvents
JobsMobile SiteMobile App
 
Healthcare Finance News Government Health IT EHRWatch Healthcare Payer News HITECHWatch ICD10Watch mHIMSS PhysBizTech NHINWatch
©2012 MedTech Media Healthcare IT News is a publication of MedTech Media
Subscribe Advertise About Us Privacy Policy