Suggested Content
- Beacon Communities snag more money for IT
- HHS withdraws breach notification rule in wake of $1M Rite Aid case
- On Daschle, expectations
- Inspector General review highlights IT challenges for HHS
- HHS names 32 Pioneer ACOs
- Community college training of HIT professionals questioned
- OIG calls for federal crackdown on portable x-ray suppliers
- 32 Pioneer ACOs named by HHS
- HHS releases proposed ACO regulations
- Veterans Affairs CIO Roger Baker on VLER progress
Related Resources
- Children's Hospital Los Angeles: Deploying SSO Support Caregiver Workflow
- Six Ways to Protect Patient Safety
- The 4Cs of Global Healthcare Reform
- Focus on Patient Care without Worrying about Underlying Technology
- The Healthcare IT Innovation Imperative: Harnessing the Power of Technology for 21st Century Care Models
WASHINGTON – The Department of Health and Human Services withdrew its final breach notification rule for unsecured protected health information last week, with health privacy advocates calling it "a win" for patient privacy.
The rule had been effective since last Sept. 23.
In announcing the withdrawal of the rule, HHS officials said, "This is a complex issue and the Administration is committed to ensuring that individuals' health information is secured to the extent possible to avoid unauthorized uses and disclosures, and that individuals are appropriately notified when incidents do occur." HHS officials said.
HHS intends to publish a new final rule in the Federal Register "in the coming months," they said.
Patient Privacy Rights congratulated HHS for acknowledging the flawed rule and the need for stronger patient protections.
According to Peel, Patient Privacy Rights opposed a section of the rule they call, the "harm standard."
The "harm standard" would allow businesses entities that suffer a breach of data security to decide whether patients are likely to be harmed by the breach. "Put simply, the proposed final rule granted the power to decide whether to report breaches or not to the businesses that failed to protect sensitive health data, and would not want to disclose breaches," Peel said. "Talk about letting the fox guard the hen house."
Last October, House leaders wrote HHS protesting the "harm standard," calling on HHS to revise or revoke it.



