HIT funding: What would Romney do?
Mitt Romney
Presidential candidate Mitt Romney is no stranger to health information technology advocacy. As governor of Massachusetts, he helped spur initiatives such as the $50 million nonprofit Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative, for instance, and he signed a 2003 bill meant to enable Bay State providers to more widely adopt e-prescribing.
However, some experts say Romney’s Republican platform, promoting limited federal government and increased fiscal autonomy to the states could very well put federally funded health IT initiatives at risk.
Ed Daniels, consultant for health IT firm Point-of-Care Partners, wrote that, when it comes to health IT, “Romney is likely to be more of a cheerleader than a funder.”
He surmised that if Romney were elected, eventually, “Government incentive payments for EHR adoption likely will be dropped from future budgets.”
Romney has repeatedly and unabashedly stated that if he were elected, his first act in office would be to eliminate the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).
[See also: Paul Ryan's Congressional health IT timeline]
During the third presidential debate Oct. 22, Romney, when speaking of balancing the budget, said, “[The] number one I get rid of is Obamacare. There are a number of things that sound good but, frankly, we just can't afford them. And that one doesn't sound good, and it's not affordable, so I get rid of that one from day one.”
But the ACA, of course, has many defenders.
After the Supreme Court’s landmark June 28 decision to uphold the law, Dave Roberts, vice president of government relations at HIMSS, said, “Consumers are going to be demanding ways to access their health information, and this will just be the tip of iceberg on the innovations we’re going to see, now that this issue has been decided.”
The ACA contains provisions to “improve the quality of healthcare by increasing quality data collected by health IT, creating new programs that involve health IT, and giving payments to existing entities for the use and improvement of health IT." It also has provisions related to setting new operating rules and standards that will directly or indirectly control the use and innovation of health IT and increasing the size of the health IT workforce across different sectors.
Romney has also established himself as a fierce opponent of Obama’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009. That position may appeal to the GOP’s core constituents, but even some opponents of ARRA as a whole have conceded that Obama got some things right.
“I can report that there is one part of the president’s stimulus plan that is working. Really working,” wrote business and technology columnist Gene Marks in a July Forbes piece. The part of the law Marks supports happens to be the some $20 billion allocated for health IT adoption. "Slowly but surely,” he wrote, “It’s working.”
Showing 3 Comments
John Trader say: Proof is the success of the program
Great article Erin. You make a valid point (and one that's worth repeating) that the solvency of the incentive programs will greatly depend on demonstrating their success. Granted, there may not be enough time for all providers to show that changing to an EHR system has been effective, but for those where it has, it becomes essential to get out the word about the success of the program.
No where will this be more powerful than showing how the shift to EHR digitization has affected patients. I know that a lot of providers are struggling to get patients to become more engaged and this will be an issue but perhaps patient engagement will be the strongest testimony of program success and may just save future funding allocations.
MedQuack say: Don't Give Him Too Much Credit - Like any CEO-he doesn't know
He's not any smarter than the bank CEOs that don't understand their business models...way too complex and back when he was governor, things were simpler...he's like the rest of them out there. How many times did we see Jamie Dimon say "I don't know" on video when asked about the JP Morgan business models, it's a sign of the times. Get educated and see how this works and watch the documentary called "Quants" the Alchemists of Wall Street" and see how the use flat out fiction, code created to make money and accuracy takes the back seat to making money, been that way for years, you just don't see it as code and formulas run silently on server 24/7 making impacting decisions about all of us..and with dirty code and formulas when you look for accuracy and honesty.
Algo Duping 101 will help educate and bring you up to date..goes on everywhere and hear the quants even tell you that CEOs don't understand what they create and how economists have little value, as "they" have the magic formulas..and that is true, they have that attitude of being smarter than the rest of us, they wrote it and pulled out some fiction to do it.
Mike Barnard say: HIT Funding - What Would Romney Do? Let's hope a LOT less
"...could very well put federally funded health IT initiatives at risk."
I surely hope so. The Constitution does not grant the federal government the authority to establish HIT standards, requirements, protocols, etc., let alone fund them.