Global market for telehealth tech on upswing
Remote patient monitoring, or telehealth, has taken huge strides forward, with demand for this technology on the rise – especially among home-care agencies, disease management companies and clinical trial groups, according to a new report from market research firm Frost & Sullivan.
The advent of low-energy Bluetooth, near-field communication (NFC), secure data management and wireless sensor platforms together are driving a change in how healthcare is delivered – from a hospital-centric to a patient-centric approach, the report notes. Participation from market giants, such as GE, Google, HP, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Philips, Qualcomm, Siemens and Wal-Mart, has enabled development of remote monitoring products that effectively interface IT and life science technologies.
Frost & Sullivan’s analysis, Remote Patient Monitoring Technologies – A Strategic Assessment, finds that with the escalating need to manage chronic diseases such as diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), asthma, liver diseases and congestive heart failure, especially in the elderly population, the demand for wireless monitoring has increased significantly over the past few years.
"The demand for simple and easy-to-understand technology for chronic disease management at home using telehealth, especially for elderly people, has not only shown an increase in its demand in the U.S., Europe and Japan, but also in emerging and lucrative markets, such as India, China and other South Asian countries," said Technical Insights research associate Arjunvasan Ambigapathy. "The development of new technologies and availability of sufficient funding from government agencies and venture capital firms has stoked growth in the RPM market over the past few years."
The Remote Monitoring Access Act of 2007 offers financial incentives for potential users of RPM solutions and services, for efficiently managing chronic diseases under the Medicare Program. The market has incrementally developed over the past 12 months, assisted by investments from major companies that focused on the development of end-to-end wireless health and wellness solutions, said Ambigapathy.
[See also: Telemedicine speaker calls for next-generation monitoring IT.]
Despite being a high growth market, barriers to customer adoption include the absence of wide scale reimbursement, the lack of standardization and global regulatory policies governing technology usage, he said. Low awareness levels among patients and issues surrounding security of patient data also contribute to delays in the adoption lifecycle. Unlike other reimbursable technologies classified by a respective common procedure terminology (CPT) code, there are no specific codes assigned to telehealth or mHealth solutions. Reimbursement for electronic health record solutions indirectly benefits telehealth vendors.
[See also: Sprint, BL Healthcare add power to remote care.]
Showing 7 Comments
Kelly Mehler say: Re: robodoc
I've spoken with doctors who feel differently. Probably because they are used to writing everything down, it is as if they are creating their own system of notes that they can refer back to and instantly connect or remember certain notes. Transitioning to an EHR could be difficult because the docs are adjusting themselves to someone else's system. Yes, it saves money, time, and preferred more by patients perhaps, but for docs it can seem like busy work.
bunchesss say: Reimbursement and alternative different revenue models...
Reimbursement of telehealth seems a big challenge. This may be best dealt with by avoiding third party payers and using a membership system that would allow recurrent revenue systems which incentivize care providers to implement preventive strategies and keep patients healthy.
JMM say: Manage the underserved and the non-complex chronic patient
The first applications of telehealth should be to address patients in areas where they lack local medical services or who are unable to get to local service providers.
The second wave is more efficient and convenient management of non-complex chronic patients who just need to get labs and new scripts without taking a day off work and saddling the insurer with a $100 plus office visit.
This also helps doctors pay more attention to the patients who really need direct face to face contact. WIN-WIN-WIN
The Dude say: Telehealthcare
Telehealthcare sounds great, and I certainly see the benefits of having skilled physicians being able to remotely check in on patients. But, I believe the general population will be weary of indirect contact in a health care system that already feels impersonal.
halftime say: Patient visits as well
In addition to increased use of remote monitoring, I'd like to insurance companies cover certain levels of patient tele-visits. Reading and discussions of lab results, mainly for the renewal of long standing prescriptions is one example. See the doctor in-office for these types of visits 3-4 times a year is expensive and can be handled much less expensiviely online.
Tech4Pharm say: Online Patient Visits
I'm right there with you @Halftime. Allowing the doctors to setup and conduct routine appointments online / over the phone would be such a benefit. As a patient, this would save on the commute, the coordination, the waiting room, etc. All the pieces are there: over the web video conference, digital camera for higher res pictures (if necessary), high speed internet, and so many people gave this stuff ready to go. Patients would save time, not miss their routine scripts, and maybe since they are more willing to talk to their doctor more frequently, they might actually find out some good health advice or find something bad earlier on. Again, the simplest information/internet/consumer technology would save the day! And also, the doctor could get PAID for doing what they are supposed to do. It would even be worth it if the reimbursement and co-pay were reduced to ENCOURAGE this type of behavior.
mpfortier say: robodoc
This might be another one of those things that take a new generation to get used to. I for one, am looking forward to having this kind of access to physicians. Watching your doc typing on the laptop EMR on the screen probably feels about the same as in person.