EMR usability seen lacking
Many vendors give short shrift to the usability of their electronic medical records, says Jiajie Zhang, who is devoting the next three-plus years to addressing this usability factor – something he believes has been a barrier to physician adoption.
Zhang is overseeing one of the four federal research projects in the SHARP program. His is at the National Center for Cognitive Informatics and Decision Making in Healthcare at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, where he serves as co-director.
“Only a small number of EHR vendors have their in-house team doing EHR usability,” Zhang says. “Most EHR vendors do not do that systematically.”
As Zhang sees it, it’s work that ought to be done systematically, by professionals especially trained to measure usability. It’s a science. The feature most lacking in EMRs, he observed, is user-centered design. Many EMRs are in the age of DOS rather than Windows, he said.
Rosemarie Nelson, principal of MGMA Consulting Group, provides help with EMR purchase and installation for physician practices. It helps that she knows the technology frontwards and backwards and that she once managed a medical practice.
Some EMRs on the market today are easy to use, and some aren’t, she said.
“Some are quick and easy to learn and that creates a great first impression for the physician,” she said. “But some are clunky and cumbersome with day-to-day tasks between physicians and their support staff, and that makes them less easy to use, and unfortunately many physicians learn this the hard way – during implementation, post-purchase.”
What is most often missing, in her view, is a commonsense approach to workflow – how the typical physician’s day flows as he or she interacts with patients and the practice’s support staff.
“The EMRs could be better at taking advantage of the well choreographed dance between doctor and clinical support staff to accomplish seeing patients in the office and attending to the aftercare communications (results, calls) associated with taking care of patients,” Nelson said.
eClinicalWorks, which claims 55,000 providers across more than 8,000 practices using its solutions, views the usability factor as “huge,” says Heather Caouette, spokeswoman for the company.
“In fact, many of our customers have told me that they selected eClinicalWorks because of the usability of our product,” Caouette said. “Usability is key to get practices to use the technology and it is something that eClinicalWorks has taken seriously since the beginning.”
Showing 2 Comments
Dan Cane say: This is a fantastic article!
It pains me to no end that in EMR “bake offs” usability is rarely even considered, and when it is, it’s weighted the same as a line-item like “pediatric growth charts.” Usability plays directly into the efficiency and use of an application. Good UX (User eXperience) cannot be added to a product after-the-fact – it needs to be planned, designed, implemented, and constantly reevaluated.
We have created a product specifically for Dermatologists. Why only one market, and why derm? Simple – by focusing on one market we can create a highly useable offering for that market. An EMR designed to the entire market has to make sacrifices to accommodate the massive variability of medicine itself and the range of ways to practice medicine.
When almost every article I read talks about lost efficiency and productivity when adopting EMRS (not all are bad mind you), our users report to us something else: time-savings. If we can save doctors a minute or two per patient, and they see 30, 40, or in some practices 50+ patients in a day -- that time savings is worth a great deal.
I am so happy to read that others share our passion for building useable products. While Dermatology is just a small portion of medicine, I encourage you to a look at what we have developed at Modernizing Medicine ( http://www.modernizingmedicine.com ). EMA Dermatology, which has a native iPad application, is an entirely touch-based, adaptive EMR. We certainly welcome the feedback, and hope that our passion for making a highly useable EMR is shared by others.
debg say: This reads like an
This reads like an advertisement, not an objective article.