Docs take mHealth baby steps, use tablets for the basics

Whether it's due to skepticism or a lack of resources, not all doctors are sold on the prospects of mHealth. But for those looking to stick their toe into the pool, tablets are finding widespread adoption as a good entry point for clinics and doctor's offices.

Recent surveys have indicated roughly 80 percent of doctors use mobile devices, and between 40 percent and 50 percent are using tablets. With new tablets coming out almost every week, and surveys indicating almost 80 percent of consumers want to see their doctors using mobile health solutions, clinicians are turning to tablets for that most basic of functions: Patient registration.

Eric Esrailian, MD, vice chief of the Division of Digestive Diseases at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, is using iPads loaded with Tonic software in a pilot program to capture patient information in the waiting room. The electronic questionnaires, he says, replace the tiresome, wasteful and not-always-accurate paper surveys and are boosting patient satisfaction to new levels.

[See also: mHealth app takes on nation's leading cause of death.]

"It's really a breath of fresh air for us," says Esrailian. "We're eliminating reams of paper with this. It's also really timely and efficient."

Big Data and Healthcare Analytics Forum June 4-5 Washington

Esrailian says people of all walks of life enjoy using the tablets, and doctors are seeing advantages in that they don't have to pore over bad handwriting, and all the information is electronically accumulated and stored. That data could eventually migrate into an electronic medical record, he says, if UCLA wants to continue on the mHealth path.

"Mobile health is creating a new era of patient care and data collection," he says. "What we really want to do here is improve patient satisfaction by making it easier for them (to come into the clinic and register) and electronically gather all the information we need. There's a lot of potential here for data collection, and longitudinally entering other results."

At USF Health in Tamps, Fla., Lennox Hoyte, MD, director of obstetrics and gynecology, is using the Allscripts Wand application to enter patient information onto an iPad at the point of care. Since implementing the app in a beta test roughly three months ago, he estimates saving four to six minutes of time per patient, or two hours a day. That means he's getting home at 5 p.m., in time for dinner with the family, instead of 7 p.m.

[See also: As more consumers connect, mHealth market soars.]

More importantly, Hoyte says, he's actually "seeing" his patients, rather than talking to them over his shoulder as he tries to type information into a desktop computer.

"Patients don't care how you document – they really don't," he says. "They're coming in for the same things they came in for 200 years ago … but they do care about how they're treated."

Previous
1

Showing 1 Comments

Mike Barnard say: Yes, right on, but

Mobile computing for doctors and their support staff is a perfect example of how IT can improve patient care. Two questions:

1 - does table mHealth support writing recognition? The article says doctors "...don't have to pore over bad handwriting." How is data getting into electronic records? Doctors and nurses still have to enter free-form information about a patient. Are the writing on the tablets or are the using voice recognition or both (or neither)?

2 - what about security? This will be paramount for the foreseeable future, particularly with MU and other ways the federal gov'ts is dictating IT use for healthcare, and the requirements to make patient records readily available anywhere. As far as I can tell, the "cloud" is still far from secure enough for storing patient records.