Healthcare IT NewsHealthcare IT News
TwitterFacebookLinkedInHealthcareITNews International
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Business Intelligence
    • Claims Processing
    • Data Warehousing
    • EDIS
    • Election 2012
    • Electronic Health Records
    • Enterprise Content Management
    • Enterprise Resource Planning
    • ePrescribing
    • Financial/Revenue Cycle Management
    • Health Information Exchange (HIE)
    • ICD-10
    • Meaningful Use
    • Mobile/Wireless
    • Network Infrastructure
    • Policy and Legislation
    • Privacy and Security
    • Quality and Safety
    • RIS and PACS
    • RTLS
    • Telehealth
    • Workforce Management
  • Issues
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
  • Blog
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • On Demand Webinars
  • White Papers
  • Events
  • HIMSS JobMine
  • Press Releases
  • Slideshows
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Supplements
  • Survey Analyses
  • Newsletters
  • Advertise
  • Login
  • Register
  • SUBSCRIBE
    • Newspaper
    • Email Newsletter
Home » News » Electronic Health Records | Enterprise Content Management | Quality and Safety
Receive News By Email

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • RSS Icon
  

Docs stress importance of reporting EHR problems

November 16, 2010 | Molly Merrill, Associate Editor

Related Resources

  • Leveraging Microsoft HealthVault to Help Your Patients Better Manage Their Health
  • Moving Business Communication to the Cloud
  • Patch Management: 4 Best Practices for Today's Healthcare IT
  • Improving Community Connectivity, Care Coordination and Outcomes
  • Healthcare unwired: New business models delivering care anywhere

WASHINGTON – There's little question that electronic health records reduce adverse drug events and improve quality of care. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't be doing everything to make sure they're as safe and as easy to use as possible, said National Coordinator for HIT, David Blumenthal, MD, at the launch of EHRevent.org, a new safety reporting system that will allow healthcare providers to report adverse issues related to the implementation and use of EHRs.

EHRevent.org "is an important piece of the puzzle to make sure that happens," he said.

The system was launched by not-for-profit iHealth Alliance, which is composed of medical society and professional liability carrier executives in collaboration with federal agencies, and PDR Network, which is hosting EHRevent.org under the guidance of the alliance.

The purpose of the network is to put event reporting is at the fingertips of physicians, says Edward Fotsch, MD, CEO of PDR Network.

This will be done by integrating the system into websites of participating liability carriers, medical societies, regional extension centers, PDR Network and other partners, including EHR system vendors. For example, a participating EHR vendor would have the link to EHRevent.org imbedded in its solution so doctors would only have to click on it to fill out a report form.

The form requires answering nine fields, but allows providers to add more detailed information about the event. This information would then be de-identified and stored in a Patient Safety Organization (PSO), a federally designated entity that would keep the information safe and secure. 

By collecting this information, providers will be able to show trends related to EMR problems rather than just anecdotes, said Nancy Dickey, MD, chair, iHealth Alliance, president, Texas A&M Health Science Center and vice chancellor for Health Affairs, Texas A&M University System.

"This is an opportunity to discern patterns and learn lessons," added Blumenthal, who noted that assuming that it is just the technologies fault is premature, he said.

In fact, said Fotsch, the majority of EHR problems occur during education and training. He said this would be reported under "pilot error." 

David Troxel, MD, medical director of The Doctors Company, a physician-owned professional liability insurer, says he is aware of three EHR related medical malpractice claims that have surfaced recently. Two of the cases suggest problems that occurred during the transition for paper to electronic records. Troxel called this a "perilous period."

"We participated in this system [EHRevent.org] because we all know that any time new technology is adopted there are unintended or unanticipated events that occur," he said.

In both cases physicians were not alerted to the fact that patients had abnormal test results. Troxel said there is always the possibility that key information, when scanned into a patient's record, can get lost. He suspects that the tests were perhaps filed in a folder somewhere else, where the physicians didn't know where to look for it, or weren't scanned into the latest test portion of their records. The result – both patients were diagnosed with advanced cancer.

The third case deals with an independent practice association that negotiated a single EHR contract user agreement for its practices. The unintended consequence was that every doctor in the association had access to each other's patient records – patients they'd never seen, or never would see.

This violates the privacy rules under HIPAA, said Troxel, noting that there's still uncertainty about how to deal with an issue like this one. "[EHRevent.org] can create a mechanism where [physicians] can share problems like this and nip them in the bud early," he said.

"The time is now to collect data," said Lawrence Smarr, president and CEO, Physician Insurers Association of America. EHRevent.org will help us identify, track and address EHR problems, he said.

Related Topics:
  • David Blumenthal
  • David Troxel
  • Edward Fotsch
  • Nancy Dickey
  • PDR Network
  • Texas
  • Texas A&M
  • Texas A&M University
  • Washington
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Enterprise Content Management
  • Quality and Safety

Reader Comments (1)Login to Post a Comment

kwkeirstead says: Alerting Patients re Abnormal Test Results
November 16, 2010 | 11:21PM GMT

Re "unintended or unanticipated events that occur" - "physicians were not alerted to the fact that patients had abnormal test results. Troxel said there is always the possibility that key information, when scanned into a patient's record, can get lost. He suspects that the tests were perhaps filed in a folder somewhere else, where the physicians didn't know where to look for it, or weren't scanned into the latest test portion of their records".

In the EHR system that my company markets, all scans go to the patient file (for security reasons) BUT the operator has the choice to cause a hyperlink to be inserted into the EHR. The idea here is that a scan of a map showing how to get to a patient's residence really does not need to be part of the EHR.

However, I can see how an error might occur if the operator processes test results and for some reason removes the default 'highlight in EHR' directive.

It may not be enough to make routing to the EHR the default, even if we then ask 'Are you sure?' if, as and when the operator bypasses the default.

I am thinking we should revisit this and post a hyperlink in the EHR for each and every scan. A high level case manager reviewing the EHR recordings would be able to remove undesired hyperlinks.

Most Popular

Latest Headlines
Most Popular
  • 6 reasons physicians need to be on social media
  • Lawsuit seeks Allscripts CEO's removal
  • Tablet adoption by docs soars
  • FCC to vote on broadband space for patient monitoring
  • Computing cluster speeds targeted treatments for childhood cancer
  • Lawsuit seeks Allscripts CEO's removal
  • Web First: Q&A with Allscripts CEO Glen Tullman
  • 6 reasons physicians need to be on social media
  • Oregon to implement new statewide HIE
  • Tablet adoption by docs soars
more news

WEBINARS AND WHITE PAPERS

  • ON DEMAND WEBINARS
    Redefining Value and Success in Healthcare: Charting the Path to the Future
  • WHITE PAPERS
    Mobility Advantage: Health Care Made Easier
  • WHITE PAPERS
    Driving Meaningful Use of Enterprise Content Management
  • WHITE PAPERS
    The Scarborough Hospital: Establishing a Document Management Strategy for EHRs
  • UPCOMING WEBINARS
    May 23rd @ 2PM ET--Providers’ Perceptions: EMR Impressions & Strategies, Post-Implementation
More Resources
Syndicate content

HIMSS JOBMINE

  • Network Engineer II - Carilion Clinic - Roanoke, VA
  • EMR Implementation - Project Manager Rothman Specialty Hospital - Rothman Specialty Hospital - Bensalem, PA
  • Director of Information Systems - Mission Regional Medical Center - Mission, Texas
  • Biostatistician II - Saudi Aramco - Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
  • Chief Information Officer - West Virginia - InfoPartners, Inc. - West Virginia
more jobs

Marketplace

Follow Healthcare IT News on TwitterFan Healthcare IT News on FacebookJoin Healthcare IT News on LinkedInRSS Subscriptions
Digital EditionBlogEvents
JobsMobile SiteMobile App
 
Healthcare Finance News Government Health IT EHRWatch Healthcare Payer News HITECHWatch ICD10Watch mHIMSS PhysBizTech NHINWatch
©2012 MedTech Media Healthcare IT News is a publication of MedTech Media
Subscribe Advertise About Us Privacy Policy