AMA mounts campaign to halt ICD-10
The American Medical Association (AMA) on Tuesday revealed that its delegates voted in favor of trying to stop ICD-10.
"The implementation of ICD-10 will create significant burdens on the practice of medicine with no direct benefit to individual patients' care," Peter W. Carmel, MD, AMA president said in a prepared statement.
[See also: Hospitals struggle with switch to ICD-10]
At the 65th Interim Meeting of the AMA in New Orleans, in fact, “the AMA House of Delegates voted to work vigorously to stop implementation of ICD-10,” primarily on the grounds that the “timing could not be worse” for this “massive and expensive undertaking” brings too little benefit to physicians, and will prove disruptive as they also work to implement EHRs and demonstrate meaningful use.
Citing a 2008 study, AMA explained that projected costs of converting to the unfunded code sets mandate will cost even a three-physician practice $84,000 and slightly more than $285,000 for a 10-physician group.
During the interim meeting the resolution was first introduced by Alabama and Mississippi delegations, the American Association of Clinical Urologists and the American Urological Association.
[See also: Scared of ICD-10? ICD-11 is in the wings]
"ICD-10 does nothing to improve care of patients," said Mobile, Ala., urologist Jeff Terry, MD, a delegate for the Medical Association of the State of Alabama, according to an amednews report.
As part of its statement, AMA explained that it “will continue working to help physicians keep their focus where it should be – on their patients."