Healthcare IT NewsHealthcare IT News
TwitterFacebookLinkedInHealthcareITNews International
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Business Intelligence
    • Claims Processing
    • Data Warehousing
    • EDIS
    • Election 2012
    • Electronic Health Records
    • Enterprise Content Management
    • Enterprise Resource Planning
    • ePrescribing
    • Financial/Revenue Cycle Management
    • Health Information Exchange (HIE)
    • ICD-10
    • Meaningful Use
    • Mobile/Wireless
    • Network Infrastructure
    • Policy and Legislation
    • Privacy and Security
    • Quality and Safety
    • RIS and PACS
    • RTLS
    • Telehealth
    • Workforce Management
  • Issues
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • On Demand Webinars
  • White Papers
  • Blog
  • Events
  • HIMSS JobMine
  • RSS
  • Press Releases
  • Slideshows
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Supplements
  • Survey Analyses
  • Newsletters
  • Advertise
  • Login
  • Register
  • SUBSCRIBE
    • Newspaper
    • Email Newsletter
Home » News » Electronic Health Records
Receive News By Email

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • RSS Icon
  

The 7 Deadly Sins of EMR implementation

September 07, 2011 | Michelle McNickle, Web Content Producer

Related Resources

  • The Key Findings of the 2012 HIMSS Analytics Report: Security of Patient Data
  • Improving Care Coordination with Online Services
  • Healthcare unwired: New business models delivering care anywhere
  • Role of Analytics Post Healthcare Reform
  • Where Information and Care Meet: Secure Mobile Healthcare Solutions that Drive Care Coordination

Congratulations! You've committed to an EMR, which is an accomplishment in itself. But the hardest part is still to come: getting it to work.

From failing to plan to skipping out on training, many mistakes can be made during the implementation process. And although they may not be as juicy as wrath, envy or lust, the Seven Deadly Sins of EMR implementation could wreak just as much havoc.

Steve Waldren, MD, director of the American Academy of Family Physicians' Center for Health IT, and Rosemarie Nelson, principal of the MGMA Consulting Group, gave us the worst sins providers can commit during EMR implementation.

[See also: Top 5 worst EMR myths.]

 1. Not doing your homework:  Avoiding supplier problems means background research and thorough evaluations of vendors and products. And beware: vendors tend to make promises they can't keep. According to Waldren, it's important to get the specifics down on paper. "Often, a doctor will ask if [an EMR] can do this or that, and a vendor will say yes. Then, they're surprised when in reality, it doesn't. Doctors need to make sure all expectations are met in writing."

2. Assuming the EMR is a magic bullet
: It's important to remember the EMR is a conversion, not an upgrade. Although the system will save you time and money in the long run, Waldren warns it isn't an instant fix to issues in the workplace. "Most people think an EMR solves problems," he said. "But an EMR will only amplify problems that already exist in the practice."

3. Not including nurses in the planning stages
: Nelson says doctors tend to think a new EMR is all about them. "They don't think about how much the nurse preps the chart, how often the nurse presents information to them, and how much the nurse handles patients over the phone," she said. Having nurses involved from the beginning avoids future conflicts, and considering their thoughts on product selection and implementation will only help with workflow. "[The implementation] needs to be done with the support of staff; everyone needs to be involved," added Waldren.

CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE

  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Related Topics:
  • American Academy
  • MGMA Consulting Group
  • Michelle McNickle
  • Rosemarie Nelson
  • Steve Waldren
  • Electronic Health Records

Reader Comments (5)Login to Post a Comment

adeaninej says: Before you purchase an EHR do your homework
November 28, 2011 | 6:06PM GMT

I work for a health and human service agency and we've gone through 2 EHR implementations. Using the old cliche "the devil is in the details" is very appropriate when approaching your EHR selection and implementation. You need to have a clear understanding of what it is you do and how you do it. Do not make assumptions as to your workflow processes as this could be deterimental to your selection process and subsequent implementation. Get input early from key stakeholders that will be accessing the system (Billing staff,clinicians, field based staff, admitting staff, QA, IT,and of course your execs). Ask for customer references and call, or schedule a site visit. Insist that the vendor provide you with the names of customers that my not be on their "preferred customer" list. You can learn a lot from customers that have struggled with their implementations. Have the vendor perform scripted demonstrations. You don't want to see the marketing show and tell features, you need to know how the software will work within in your environment. EHR implementations are time consuming and costly. You need to arm yourself with as much information as possible before you sign the contract.

sueann@cottonwoodpeds.com says: ... and #8: Checking with the business office
September 16, 2011 | 3:09PM GMT

Most physicians and providers want to get paid. How they get paid is a function of the business office.

If the Bill side of the EMR is lousy, doesn't matter how good the Chart side is.

pjcasey75 says: Point 6 - Need help? Call your REC
September 14, 2011 | 10:36AM GMT

One of the less advertised aspects of the ARRA stimulus funding to promote the adoption of EHRs is the Federally subsidized Regional Extension Center (REC) program which established 62 consulting centers across the nation to provide very low cost (in some cases, free) expertise to help providers get through the arduous task of adopting an EHR.

RECs assist practices to achieve meaningful use no matter where the practice currently is along the path. They can help with everything from initial practice assessment, workflow analysis, vendor evaluation and contract review. But even if you've already committed to an EHR, you can then use ALL your funded consulting hours to help with training, meaningful use gap analysis (i.e., how far away are you from achieving and what do you need to do to get there), guidance regarding privacy and security requirements, registration with CMS for the appropriate available Medicare or Medicaid incentives and finally, attesting to meaningful use both now and in the coming years. In Texas, for example, it costs just $300 per provider to access 20 hours of CME coursework and anywhere from 30 to 50 hours of on-site consulting services.

This article outlines the 7 deadly sins of EHR implementation. Maybe the 8th should be not availing yourself of help when it's there for the asking.

dch says: plug and play & the market
September 12, 2011 | 8:03AM GMT

Re: "Microsoft made us think everything is plug and play; the same with a MacBook," she said. "They think 'I can do the same thing with an EMR.' "

... Spoken as if that is, somehow, a problem.

The fact that vendors haven't reached "plug and play" yet is more a problem with the vendors than the doctors. That's a lot of why docs haven't lined up to buy this stuff. Poor usability (... and high TCO)

Microsoft and Apple, for all their faults, did what they did without federal mandates to put computers in every house. Their success occurred in the marketplace, where people voted freely with money.

Sadly, EHR vendors have not been able to accomplish that. So, rather than producing more desirable, less expensive products, they accuse docs of being Luddites and get Washington to mandate use of their deficient products.

CoreyJ says: There is no "one size fits all"
September 12, 2011 | 9:37AM GMT

In reply to "dch";
That is a pretty broad stroke statement. I do agree, many EMR's do have poor usability. Do you remember windows for work-groups? I do respect your opinion and much does need to be done. Maybe some of that ARRA money should have been spent for EMR development before forcing docs to start implementing EMR's? Lastly, do you really believe that the EMR companies "Got" Washington to mandate use of EMR's?

One thing that I see happening a lot of time in the medical practice is that the decision maker do not give due diligence as to what they need now, will need in the future and exactly what they wish to accomplish. This article is correct, there is no silver bullet. I have found as an EMR developer that many doctors are putting off the responsibility of EMR implementation on the staff. This is simply irresponsible of the doctor.

Unfortunately the Govt has put the cart in front of the horse again. The only upside right now is that finally providers are modernizing their office to at least the 1990's in respect to technology.

Most Popular

Latest Headlines
Most Popular
  • 6 reasons physicians need to be on social media
  • Lawsuit seeks Allscripts CEO's removal
  • AMA calls for 2-year extension of ICD-10 deadline
  • Twitter recap: Lee Aase talks social media in healthcare
  • FCC to vote on broadband space for patient monitoring
  • Allscripts in skid mode as shares plunge, chairman ousted
  • Lawsuit seeks Allscripts CEO's removal
  • Web First: Q&A with Allscripts CEO Glen Tullman
  • 6 keys to the future of analytics and big data in healthcare
  • No 'bubble' for healthcare IT, analysts say
more news

WEBINARS AND WHITE PAPERS

  • WHITE PAPERS
    Mobility Advantage: Health Care Made Easier
  • WHITE PAPERS
    Winning the EHR Battle with Enterprise Content Management
  • WHITE PAPERS
    The Scarborough Hospital: Establishing a Document Management Strategy for EHRs
  • UPCOMING WEBINARS
    June 5th @ 1PM ET--Get Control of Your Medical Images with a Cloud-Based Vendor-Neutral Archive
  • UPCOMING WEBINARS
    May 23rd @ 2PM ET--Providers’ Perceptions: EMR Impressions & Strategies, Post-Implementation
More Resources
Syndicate content

HIMSS JOBMINE

  • Biostatistician II - Saudi Aramco - Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
  • Chief Information Officer - West Virginia - InfoPartners, Inc. - West Virginia
  • IT Technical Services Director - Genesis HealthCare System - Zanesville, OH
  • VP, CLINICAL INFORMATICS - The Methodist Hospital System - Houston, TX
  • Senior Radiology Information Systems Analyst - Universal Health Services - King of Prussia, PA
more jobs

Marketplace

Follow Healthcare IT News on TwitterFan Healthcare IT News on FacebookJoin Healthcare IT News on LinkedInRSS Subscriptions
Digital EditionBlogEvents
JobsMobile SiteMobile App
 
Healthcare Finance News Government Health IT EHRWatch Healthcare Payer News HITECHWatch ICD10Watch mHIMSS PhysBizTech NHINWatch
©2012 MedTech Media Healthcare IT News is a publication of MedTech Media
Subscribe Advertise About Us Privacy Policy