6 golden rules of EMR implementation

A few months ago, we chronicled the 7 most deadly sins of EMR implementation. From ignoring nurses to declining help, these offenses can be hard to make right. 

But, in an effort to help big and small practices alike avoid the most common EMR faux pas, we followed up with Rosemarie Nelson, principal of the MGMA Consulting Group, and asked for her opinion on the best practices for implementing an EMR system.

Here are Nelson’s six golden rules of EMR implementation:

1. Include nursing staff.  When we first asked Nelson about the sins associated with implementation, the most detrimental, according to her, was forgetting about your nurses. And now, Nelson stands by that mantra and believes the EMR isn’t all about the physician. “Physicians are the owners, or the leaders, or the key decision makers, but they are not the exclusive users of the EMR,” she said. She mentioned nurses account for almost 75 percent of the use of the chart, and physicians, 25 percent. “A successful EMR implementation focuses on how the nurses can assist the physician in the integration of the EMR into clinical workflow,” she said. “Too often, an EMR committee is created in a medical practice, and there’s no nursing representative. Bring in the nurses.”

[See also: EMR links Montana centers.]

2. Recognize the opportunity to change and improve your workflow.  “Most practices have not optimized processes,” said Nelson. “And many practices have not standardized on forms and procedures.” According to her, technology “changes what is feasible,” so look to the EMR implementation as a chance to find new efficiencies in your workflow. It’s important to remember, though, the EMR shouldn’t be used as a magic bullet to fix holes and other issues in workflow. "Most people think an EMR solves problems," said Steve Waldren, MD, director for the American Academy of Family Physicians’ Center for Health IT. "But an EMR will only amplify problems that already exist in the practice.”

3. Schedule even more training.  When we first spoke with Nelson, she mentioned outside influences tend to form attitudes around EMR training. "Microsoft made us think everything is plug and play; the same with a MacBook," she said. "They think 'I can do the same thing with an EMR.' The difference is, it's a complicated environment with a lot of regulation, coding, and documentation. You have to dedicate the time for training." Nelson says to schedule time outside of office hours for you and your staff to “get on the EMR and actually walk through the tasks you’ll perform when you go live.” It will cost you overtime, she says, or even lost productivity if you close office hours. “Budget for additional training costs, so that you and your staff can get the most from your investment in the EMR.” 

Previous
1

Showing 5 Comments

sndira say: Enhancing workflows

Thanks for the golden rules. With regard to improving work flows. There are two sides to it, on the one side, EHR vendors need to support CDOs to improve on their workflows, and on the other side, EHR vendors need to design applications that can be easily adjusted to suit different work flows in different CDO settings. In our roll out in hospitals in Uganda, we notice slight differences in work flows even along the OPD chain, differences that could be easily solved from one hospital to another with the help of dynamic settings in the application. A typical example is at what point in the work flow a patient is physically examined, e.g. weight, pressure, pulse. How does the application design enable a dynamic shift of this stage in the process to the next station?

Merry Ann Moore say: Rule 7

Great piece Michelle & Rosemarie, might I add the seventh golden rule for EMR implementation: when evaluating best solutions for your enterprise, make sure data security is right up there with user-friendliness on your must-haves. This week saw the $1B Sutter Health lawsuit over patient data security breaches. Check out Proxense's white paper on EHR security at http://proxense.com/white-papers/.

Janie Schumaker say: A Few Thoughts

Thank you for the article. There are some great points here. I could not agree more that nurses need to be included in the decision and the choosing of the EMR. They can really make or break an implementation. Secondly, the opportunity to improve workflow is frequently overlooked or there is a misconception that putting in an EMR will solve any and all workflow issues. The opposite is true and without diligent and deliberate efforts to improve workflow, the EMR will simply magnify trouble current pain points. Lastly, I would add don't sacrifice productivity for a system that is less than user friendly for your end users. So often, clinicians are asked to use systems that cripple workflow and productivity. Be sure your EMR is intuitive and user friendly!
Janie Schumaker
Manager, Client Services
The T-system

Jenna Antonelli say: EMR Linked to Telemedicine Application

Thanks for this article. As a telemedicine software company, we meet with many hospitals and one of their first concerns is always how the doctors and nurses alike do not want a telemedicine application which forces them to fill out their EMR twice. We're working toward an application which will allow their existing EMR to be fully implemented into our software. I think these golden rules will help us during the development of this application.

Jenna | SBR Health Inc.
http://www.sbrhealth.com
@SBRHealth

Arjen Westerink say: Great Advice

This is all very valuable advice, particularly the abundance of training aspect and personalization messages.