Providers need proper EHR training
Yesterday we floated a question about the proper role of government in facilitating system-wide change.
A new report raises an issue on which, in our view, there’s only one good answer.
The issue is the amount of training physicians are getting with new EHR systems. The standard recommendation, apparently, is “that doctors receive three to five days of initial training to adequately use their EHRs.”
And a new survey indicates that’s not happening.
The survey data was gathered over the course of a year from more than 2,300 physicians, and there’s definitely food for policymaker thought.
First and foremost, those surveyed said “at least three to five days of EHR training was necessary to achieve the highest level of overall satisfaction” with a new EHR system, but “nearly half (49.3 percent) of respondents indicated that they received three or fewer days of training.”
Training and ongoing technical support are often cited as holes in the HIT transition, and we’d argue there’s a clear role for government to play in filling them in. After all, while it’s referred to as an incentive program, the penalties that follow the HITECH Act’s five-year payment plan make it a program that is somewhat less than voluntary.
Having decided to corral providers into the HIT future, then, it seems only right that policymakers should pay close attention to making sure providers are getting the proper training.
But there’s another reason provider education should be considered an important job for public officials. It’s safe to say many providers simply won’t make it into the HITECH program, so they’ll be left to decide whether or not they want to make the investment on their own. If their colleagues who have forged ahead are having only limited success with EHRs, those waiting on the sidelines may decide it’s better to sit tight.
In short, even as they work to convince providers that EHRs will make their practices better, policymakers should also be making sure that those who’ve believed them are able to put their new technology to its highest and best use.
Showing 3 Comments
Christy Wilson say: EHR training is essential!
Agreed! EHR training is important. Sadly, I think many physicians didn't realize that until frustration set in. I'm not sure how much of a role the government can and will take in making more training mandatory, but we can certainly let the issue be known. It is vital that physicians in the shopping and transition phases understand how important the training is to successful implementation.
And then there is the issue of live training vs online. I wonder if there have been any studies or examples where this has been featured.
We specialize in live training!
www.mediworx.net/support
Holly Spring say: Couldn’t agree more. An EHR
Couldn’t agree more. An EHR will only deliver broad value if it’s used properly and inserted into clinicians’ workflow in a natural, effective way. There’s no one size fits all for doctors – they have individual workflow preferences. If we are going to make EHRs a broad success, we must invest more time, funds and energy into proper training and EHR support tools to ensure the systems are used to the degree they should be.
Sallie Henderson say: Providers and EHR Training
The HITECH Act has provided funding and curricula to grantees so that trained personnel can help clinicians and their office staff transition to EHRs. Vendors however seem to be focusing on hiring IT staff only. There are trained individuals with health care experience capable of providing help to clinicians but they are not being utilized.