Healthcare IT NewsHealthcare IT News
  • Home
  • Sections
    • Industry News
    • Hospitals & IDNs
    • Physician Practices & Ambulatory Care
    • Payers
    • Vendors
    • International
  • Issues
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
  • Resource Central
    • Research
    • White Papers
    • Web Seminars
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Newsletters
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Solutions Series
Select Your Homepage
Search eConnect
Login | Register
Home » Blogs » Industry News

E-mail to a FriendPrint
Social Bookmarking
  • Delicious Delicious
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Reddit Reddit
  • Newsvine Newsvine
  • Furl Furl
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Google Google
  • Yahoo Yahoo
Meaningful Use of EHRs - are hospitals ready?

Meaningful Use of EHRs - are hospitals ready?

January 12, 2010 | Robert Rowley, MD

Suggested Content

  • Surveyed hospitals not ready for ARRA deadline
  • Vendor Notebook - Eclipsys Sunrise goes live at Singapore General Hospital
  • Mass. docs ahead in IT, but gaps still exist
  • Mass Health plan incentives boost adoption
  • Vendor Notebook - Orion Health joins Alliance for Clinical Excellence

Ever since the release of the proposed final definition of Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records, as well as specifications for what constitutes a Certified EHR, we have been blogging about how this impacts physician practices who are interested in qualifying for incentive payments beginning in 2011. Our focus has been on ambulatory practices, and EHR systems geared toward them.

But what about hospitals? Hospitals are also eligible for bonus payments for implementing EHRs, and the kinds of systems applicable to an inpatient setting are the subject of their attention. Unlike ambulatory practices, where EHR adoption has historically be quite low and adoption of EHR technology will often represent a new investment in technology not previously used, hospitals are typically already invested in legacy IT systems (often separate systems within their walls, such as lab systems, imaging/radiology systems, billing systems, and medical records systems).

The task for hospitals is more often to migrate to an EHR from a legacy system (or set of systems), and show hospital-based Meaningful Use somehow. The expectation, especially for hospitals, is that several pieces will need to be fit together to achieve Meaningful Use – for example, Boston’s Beth Israel Deaconness Hospital will likely need to cobble together 6 different systems to achieve the 25 different measures, as noted on their CIO’s recent blog.

Recently, a survey of hospitals by CSC shows that hospitals are only 50% compliant with the new EHR requirements. Their press release is interesting enough to want to quote it here (with their permission):
 

FALLS CHURCH, Va., Jan 4 -- According to a survey released today by CSC (NYSE: CSC) titled "Are Hospitals Ready for Meaningful Use of EHRs?" U.S. hospitals are only halfway to qualifying for government incentive payments aimed at controlling healthcare costs while improving the quality and effective delivery of patient care. Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), hospitals will receive payments from Medicare and Medicaid starting in October 2010 for the successful implementation and effective use of electronic health records (EHRs). The goal is for hospitals to increase use of comprehensive EHR systems from 10 percent in 2009 to 55 percent by 2014, and the incentive payments are substantial: a typical 275 bed hospital would be eligible for approximately $6 million. Hospitals that do not meet federal guidelines by 2015 face reductions in Medicare reimbursement.


The United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released draft rules on the EHR incentive plan today that revealed broad gaps between government expectations and the healthcare industry's ability to meet those expectations. The CSC report shows only two-thirds of hospitals have even taken the first step: Identifying gaps in their current systems to meet the requirements for meaningful use. One quarter of hospitals meet at least 70 percent of the readiness criteria from the survey. Hospitals have the highest readiness scores for privacy and security protection, while the use of required EHR capabilities is furthest behind.

"The definition of ‘meaningful use' is a very important step in the process of transforming healthcare with better information for better decisions," said Deward Watts, president of CSC's Healthcare Group. "In addition to getting substantial monetary rewards, meaningful use criteria will enable our nation's hospitals to reap the full benefit of EHRs and provide the safest level of care while reducing costs of delivering, reporting and paying for care."

Hospitals do not necessarily need to purchase additional hardware or software to move forward. For instance, CSC's survey shows 70 percent of hospitals have systems capable of supporting Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE), but only eight percent have CPOE throughout the hospital with at least 75 percent of orders being entered by physicians. No hospital under 100 beds had CPOE up and running in even two units, and none of the midsized hospitals (100 - 300 beds) had the system up and running throughout the hospital.

Additional findings include:

  • Smaller hospitals have lower readiness scores especially for use of required applications and quality reporting;
  • 54 percent are using the latest software version of their EHR product, which indicates upgrading might be required to meet the criteria for meaningful use;
  • Although 89 percent report on core quality measures, only half capture the majority of the required data from their EHR system;
  • The majority (98 percent) have a policy in place to limit the disclosure of protected health information, but only 52 percent employ encryption technologies to render data unreadable or unusable in the case of unauthorized access;
  • Only 40 percent report that there is clear and broad awareness of the new civil and criminal penalties under the ARRA.

These findings came from a survey of executives from 58 hospitals and integrated health delivery networks of all sizes across the U.S. conducted by CSC. The respondents reported their readiness for HITECH incentives based on 50 indicators grouped into five general categories: Use of a certified product, current use of capabilities required for meaningful use, standards adoption, quality management and reporting, and privacy and security protection. To get a representative sample of hospitals, CSC collaborated with two state hospital associations and one hospital alliance to distribute the survey to their members. Additional surveys were obtained from CSC clients. All questions generated a "Yes" or "No" response and results were self-reported using a paper form or an online survey instrument. For complete results of the survey, visit www.csc.com/MUSurvey.

CSC's Healthcare Group, which serves healthcare providers, health plans, pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers, and allied industries around the world, is a global leader in transforming the healthcare industry through the effective use of information to improve healthcare outcomes, decision-making and operating efficiency.

This blog originally appeared at Practice Fusion's EHR Bloggers.

Related Topics:
  • Beth Israel
  • Boston
  • CSC
  • Deaconness Hospital
  • Falls Church
  • imaging
  • Medicare
  • Virginia

Reader Comments (1)Login to Post a Comment

JoeHoff says:

January 31, 2010 | 9:38PM GMT

Legacy Systems

This is an incredible opportunity for many institutions that would have delayed full adoption of an EHR. What I am particularly concerned with, given the challenges that we have experienced in the military health system, is the disposition of the legacy systems. This is particularly critical if an institution has business processes that are inextricably linked to these legacy systems. The dilemma that I see is whether to keep all or parts of the legacy system, or to implement a new comprehensive solution.
Retaining the legacy system as part of the EHR has several advantages. Often staff are familiar, and have become comfortable with (or at least tolerant of) the system. It may also be the key enabler for existing business and workflow processes. The obvious drawback is that legacy systems may not be based on current technology or standards. This can lead to significant technical challenges, lack of support, and compatibility issues during and after implementation. What an institution may end up with is a collection of systems that are insular in nature rather than a single integrated system.
Scrapping the legacy system and adopting a comprehensive EHR platform has (or at least should) have the advantage of being fully integrated, and based on current technologies and standards. The challenges of data migration, training, and the transition of key processes to a new system are daunting. Additionally, staff may see legacy systems as the center of their existence and be extremely reticent to get rid of them. If this is not carefully planned and executed there is a risk for loss of both data and productivity during the transition.
The solution is not straightforward and will likely be different from institution to institution. I believe that there are several key questions that can lead a hospital to correct answer. These questions are by no means a complete list, but should at least stimulate meaningful discussion. First, can the technology and standards of the legacy system be integrated into the comprehensive EHR without being a limiting factor? If keeping the legacy system will limit the performance, growth, or features included in the EHR it may need to be eliminated. Second, can the legacy system be interfaced/integrated with every component of the final solution? If keeping the legacy solution requires duplicate data entry and/or significant workarounds it may need to be eliminated. Finally, is the cost of support into the foreseeable future feasible? If maintaining the legacy system requires dedicated staff, is the source of potential finger pointing between vendors, or is simply no longer supported it may need to be eliminated.
The consequences of getting this wrong can be difficult to overcome. The question of what to do with legacy systems should be carefully considered. A hybrid approach where the legacy system is maintained and integrated during the initial phases of implementation while designing a permanent solution has been problematic for the military health system and is not advisable. Regardless of the choice it should be definitive and support the long term goals of the institution.

Major Joseph Hoffert, Student, Command and General Staff College, Fort Gordon, Georgia

The views expressed in this comment are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government

Login to Post a Comment

Most Popular

Latest Headlines
Most Popular
  • Consumers weigh in on top 10 meaningful use arguments
  • Survey shows nurses spend most of their time on paperwork
  • WebMD launches social media
  • Docs' file sharing risky business for patient data
  • ONC issues rough draft of 2010 HIT strategic framework
  • Healthcare industry one of the most mobile
  • ONC publishes certification rule, triggers comment period
  • Campaign to end childhood obesity in search of new apps
  • VA working on 'Aviva' - next generation of VistA
  • e-Rx "on ramp" to an electronic healthcare highway for docs

Resource Central

  • White Papers
    Six Things Hospitals Need to Know About Replacing Pagers With Smartphones
  • Web Seminars
    On-Demand--Part II-The Crystal Clear Healthcare Provider: How Cleveland Clinic Delivers Transparency to Stakeholders with Business Intelligence
  • Web Seminars
    On-Demand--The Key to Addressing Regulatory Compliance While Improving your Financial Position through Effective Health Information Management
  • Videos
    Success Story: Sisters of Mercy Health
  • Podcasts
    How one hospital plans to show meaningful use of IT
More Resources
Syndicate content

HEALTHCARE IT JOB SPOT

  • Clinical Informatics / Physician - Epic - Verona, WI
  • Manager of Clinical Applications - George Washington University Hospital - Washington, DC
  • Nursing System Analyst II - Randolph Hospital - Asheboro, NC
  • Database Administrator - CarolinaEast Health System - New Bern, NC
  • VARIOUS IT JOBS!! - Martin Memorial Health Systems - Stuart, FL
more jobs
receive news by email

  • Healthcare Finance News

    Healthcare Finance News is the leading news source for healthcare's financial managers.

  • EHRWatch.com

    EHRWatch.com offers news, commentary and community participation on the developments in electronic health records.

  • Priming the Pump

    Priming the Pump provides practical news on the stimulus package and the incentives that it offers to healthcare providers.

  • Facebook

    Join Healthcare IT News on Facebook to connect with other readers!

  • NHINWatch

    Visit NHINWatch.com for coverage of the Nationwide Health Information Network.

  • Mobile Health Watch

    Stay up to date on the latest mobility news at Mobile Health Watch.

  • MedTech Publishing

    Visit our company Web page to learn more about MedTech Publishing.

  • LinkedIn

    Join our LinkedIn group to connect with other readers. Click here to join the group.

     

  • Healthcare IT Job Spot

    Check out the latest open positions at Healthcare IT Job Spot.

Marketplace

  • Home
  • Issues
  • Resource Central
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About Us
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
Healthcare IT News is a publication of MedTech Publishing Company LLC.
For more information about MedTech Publishing Company and its publications, please visit medtechpublishing.com.
©2009 MedTech Publishing
Powered by Phase2 Technology.