ICD-10-CA: What really went wrong in Canada
A benefit of being one of the very few countries in the world to not implement ICD-10 coding yet is that we can learn from how the other countries did it. Canada is one of those countries where we can find lessons.
- 5 lessons the U.S. can learn from other countries' ICD-10 moves
- 3 lessons Canadian healthcare can teach us about ICD-10 implementation
Canada's single payer system staggered ICD-10-CA/CCI implementation across its provinces from 2001 through April 2005. And Gillian Price, currently Project Director Canada at QuadraMed, was a consultant doing operational reviews for Canadian healthcare organizations during that time. She was a part of the ICD-10 implementation at hospitals and said it got easier as she learned from each ICD-10-CA implementation.
Here are some of the problems that Canadian healthcare professionals encountered implementing ICD-10-CA:
There wasn't enough time for training
Price contends training will never be enough. There is nothing any organization can do to make any person 100 percent ready for ICD-10 coding. There is a point that medical coders need to take personal responsibility for their development and learn what they need to learn.
She had an interesting analogy about the attitudes she encountered while planning ICD-10 projects. She compared medical staff to:
- Ducks: They are always quacking and choosing to resist change.
- Pigeons: They are quick to flee (retire).
- Swans: They are Price's favorite. They chose to adapt, take the time to learn and swim gracefully through the choppy waters of transition.
There was a lot of learning. In addition to medical codes and physiology, medical coders needed to learn new standardized procedures and how to communicate better with physicians. Price said the people who took "responsibility for their careers" were able to learn and adapt. They went from librarians who automatically wrote down numbers to active parts of their practices. The complexity of their work gave them a chance to be more professional.
Price also said that a lot of the resistance was institutional. That some hospitals and unions were managed by "ducks." In that kind of environment, it was hard to embrace the change and do the work necessary to create a smooth transition.
It's not just a systems problem
How many times have you read that ICD-10 isn't just about software or medical coding? That's probably because Canadian healthcare figured this out the hard way.
Price described hospitals that contracted vendors or got their IT departments to create tools that accepted ICD-10 codes and thought the job was done at that. There wasn't enough consideration for how the physicians worked or how the codes flowed downstream into billing systems.